Monday, September 15, 2014

A DAZED AND CONFUSED MOVIE CLUB


Guelph Movie Club is back from Summer Break. To celebrate, we're going back to school with Dazed and Confused on Thursday September 25 at 9:00pm. It's time to welcome the new class to movie club with a good ol' fashioned freshman hazing.

We're kidding, obviously.

It's a new year of movie club, so we hope you'll come out and support what's become a monthly homage to the movies we love.



Next month is our annual Halloween Episode. Help us pick which scary movie we watching in October using the following handy poll. Note that you can only vote once. After that, the poll won't appear when you view this blog. The results will be revealed before we watch Dazed and Confused.

One more thing before I go. The Bookshelf is great. They let me run Movie Club. They let us watch the movies we want. For those reasons and many more, I want to make sure they get as good as they give. So please, come out on the last Thursday of every month and bring your friends. Let's make Movie Club a winner for them so they can continue to make it happen for us.

'Til then, see you at the movies!

- Danny
 

Which Classic Do You Wanna Be Spooked By in October?

Monday, September 1, 2014

REVIEW: CALVARY



Christianity is so stained into the Western cloth that, really, that garment is more stain than cloth at this point. And Catholicism is soaked especially deep into those fibers, if not in terms of active faith, certainly the rituals. Maybe best evinced by Pope Francis joining Twitter (though Miley Cyrus has more followers; 18.5 million to the Pope's 4.4 million), the Catholic Church has taken strides to modernize themselves. Complicating this retrofitting is an ongoing history of ignominious abuse that is so egregious that it has, sadly, become a punchline by now. The depth of tradition and the prevalence of repugnant malfeasance can't help but make for imbalanced communities.

Father James (Brendan Gleeson) is a staffless shepherd to a flock on the West coast of Ireland. Hearing Confession, the Father is informed that he'll be killed the next Sunday. The would-be killer has had some of the above-mentioned repugnant wrong done to him, and his intention is to punishment an innocent representative of the faith instead of the guilty one. As we travel through the community, meeting its residents, we're ostensibly wondering who will do the killing--and then, gradually, who won't do it.

The second film in director John Michael McDonagh's "Suicide Trilogy" (following The Guard), Calvary--Calvary being the hill on which Christ was crucified--is as much a whodunit (or, who'lldoit) as it is a tour through a community that's come unmoored from its religious tradition. Said community is made up of the great ensemble of Dylan Moran, Chris O'Dowd, Marie-Josée Croze, Isaach De Bankolé, M. Emmet Walsh, and Aidan Gillen. Possibly about to leave them, the film weighs the worth of Father James in their lives--and the actual worth of their lives. The man, on the cusp of woebegoneness but still harboring a spark, quietly galumphs around town like a superhero who's lost his powers, but is still trying to do good for the self-destructive residents.

The more serious questions of morality knock consistently through the film like water under a dock. As well, the mystery of who threatened the Father is never far from thought. McDonagh has plenty of chances to get heavy-handed, stern, and morose, but manages a kind of quaintness and levity and humour. Imagine a version of Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town where at the outset it's revealed that one Mariposa resident will kill another before the book's end.

- Andrew

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Guelph Movie Club: Extended Summer Edition


We’ve reached the dreaded ‘mid-August’ – that time of the year when our thoughts drift toward the inevitable end of vacation, return to school, and turtlenecks (ugh, right?). But, I say no. Summer’s not over til we say it’s over.

In that spirit, the September edition of Guelph Movie Club is a thumb in the nose of fall AND winter. Forget you cold weather. You can have our warm weather when you pry it from our cold, sunburnt fingers.

So help us pick a classic summer movie to keep us warm through the cold winter nights using the poll below. (Note that you can only vote once. After that, the poll won't appear when you view this blog.)

This is the return of Guelph Movie Club after a long hiatus. I hope many of you will join us (or come back to the fold after summer break). We’ve got some fun things in mind for this year’s slate of movies so please come out, buy a soda and a popcorn, and watch a great movie with your fellow movie lovers.

'Til then, see you at the movies!

Danny
 

Which Movie Will Keep Summer Alive in September?

Monday, August 11, 2014

PRIMER: NABUCCO



Nabucco was only Verdi's third opera, but became one of his biggest, most lasting successes. It seems he was pressed to consider the subject by Merelli, the Scala's director circa 1840. Various stories about the opera became legend, especially the one that Verdi convinced himself to compose the music when he accidentally saw the words to the Chorus of Hebrew Slaves fall open in the libretto he was given. It now seems more likely that enthusiasm for this chorus was generated by the audience reaction when they saw the metaphoric link between their suppressed national identity under the Austrian Hapsburg rule, and the subjugated Hebrews under the foreign domination of the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar their king portrayed onstage. The king's name is shortened to Nabucco to make it more wieldly.

Leo Nucci as Nabucco
King Nabucco, has two daughters: Abigaile, the star soprano, and Fenena, an alto part. At war with the Babylonians, the Jews have captured Fenena, who had fallen in love with the nephew of the Jewish king, Ismaele—the tenor. Nabucco, with Abigaile and some disguised soldiers, stealthily enters the Temple at Jerusalem. When Fenena admits her love for Ismaele, the Babylonians destroy the Temple. And since this affair between Ismaele and Fenena has allowed this destruction, the Jewish high priest Zaccharia curses Ismaele as a traitor.

In Act 2, at Babylon, Nabucco puts Fenena in charge of the Hebrews as Abigaile finds evidence that she is of slave birth and bewails the fact Nabucco has kept her out of the fighting. The High Priest of Baal tells Abigaile that Fenena has released the Hebrew prisoners, and that he wants her to rule Babylon, spreading the lie that Nabucco has been killed. Abigaile sings of her own ambition to rule. Zaccharia, now captive in Babylon, discovers Fenena's conversion to Judaism, and prevents reprisals of the Jews against Ismaile. 

Abdallo, a solider, announces Nabucco's death and Abigaile's plans to seize power. As Abigaile enters and demands the Babylonian crown from Fenena, Nabucco appears and declares himself not only king, but god. Fenena sides within the Jews, which incenses her father further. In a crash of thunder he is punished for his hubris and is driven mad and Abigaile seizes the crown.

Liudmyla Monastyrska as Abigaille
In Act 3, the now raving Nabucco sees Fenena consigned to death, and prays to Jehovah to save his only daughter, whose death warrant he has been tricked by Abigaile to sign. He challenges Abigaile with being only a slave, but Abigaile has the only corroborating document and destroys it. Nabucco is helpless to save Fenena. Abigaile is unrelenting. The famous scene follows with the Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves. Zaccharia consoles them that Yahweh will help them.

In the final Act, Nabucco is still mad, but promises to follow the Jewish god if Fenena is to be saved somehow. He will restore the Jewish temple and convert to Judaism. He is miraculously restored, and freed by Abdallo, and plans to go to save Fenena. Nabucco discovers his daughter preparing to die, but he rushes in to save her and then orders the destruction of Baal, which is preempted when the idol shatters. Nabucco frees the Israelites, and Zaccharias hails Nabucco as true king and divine servant of Jehovah. Abigaile enters in remorse. She has poisoned herself and begs forgiveness of Fenena, begs for divine mercy and dies.

I suspect Verdi had his initial difficulties with the complex plot because the dramatic developments, especially later in the piece, show the actions of the deity in miraculous events, such as the restoration of Nabucco's sanity—if not already in its being removed in the first place—and the destruction of the idol of Baal at the end of the opera. In few other places in Verdi do we see the direct influence of any active deity like this. The gods, or God, is mostly a mute figure, passionately addressed or prayed to, but is never elsewhere represented as being responsive, except in ironic plot twists, that rather serve to undermine any assurance that there is a god there. Verdi was himself a religious skeptic, but obscured this mind-set from his public for obvious reasons.

There are few pieces of music so enmeshed with a national political movement vying for the formation of a nation as this opera. The Risorgimento, the movement to establish Italy as a sovereign nation, eventually took up the chorus of Hebrew Slaves as its official anthem, and the opera was made especially famous throughout the years during which Italy achieved its nationhood.

As usual, personal passion is inextricably tied up with politics and public life in a mixture that is to become ever more familiar in Verdi's operas.

The production on show here has already garnered much attention and praise since its premiere to simultaneous worldwide cinema presentation in the debut season of this format in April 2013. Although it is still an early work, the politico-historical significance of this piece has always served it to remain relatively current in opera productions since its debut.

Michael Doleschell keeps mostly to non-fiction, and is deeply devoted to music and culture and never tires of history, and is fascinated by science and the scientific method [as long as they are well explained]. He broadcasts a program of Classical Music for 3 hours every Saturday afternoon from noon till 3 on the U of G's Radio Station: CFRU. 

Monday, August 4, 2014

REVIEW: A MOST WANTED MAN


John le Carré’s novels have proven to be successful frameworks for film adaptations throughout his entire career, dating back to 1965’s The Spy Who Came in from the Cold up to the most recent A Most Wanted Man starring Philip Seymour Hoffman. Perhaps it is le Carré’s densely complicated and nuanced plots that make his stories seem somehow more true to life than the Bournes or the Bonds (and especially the Ryans and Reachers). What le Carré’s writing lacks in explosions and car chases, he more than makes up for with sophisticated, multilayered characters embroiled in puzzles of espionage. Whereas Jason Bourne is able to single-handedly foil the intelligence agencies of the entire western world, le Carré’s characters produce the same amount of tension that any good spy story will evoke, without firing a shot.

In the hands of director Anton Corbijn (The American), le Carré’s intelligent prose and character complexity is not compromised in this film adaptation. In his last role before his untimely death, Hoffman is a perfect le Carré spy, smoking and drinking too much, out of shape, disgruntled. Against the backdrop of post-9/11 paranoia he plays Günter Bachman, the head of an anti-terror team in Hamburg with the right dose of political cynicism that cuts through the fantasy that righteousness trumps ideology. Everyone has a past they don’t care to mention, an agenda they don’t wish to expose, so while he diligently tracks suspected Chechen Jihadist Issa Karpov in hopes that Karpov can expose an even greater threat, he remains suspicious of those around him claiming to be on the same side. The Americans have an interest in Dr. Faisal Abdullah, a wealthy philanthropist suspected of backing terrorist cells, while the Germans want Karpov interrogated. Human rights lawyer Annabel Richter (Rachel McAdams) wants to protect Karpov as he claims he was tortured in Russia and fears being deported. When Karpov decides to donate millions in inheritance to Abdullah, all parties stories begin to weave together. The result is not a game of cat and mouse that characterizes a usual Hollywood spy-thriller, but rather a game of dangling the bait to see who can catch the biggest fish.

The most refreshing aspect of a le Carré novel and, in this case, movie adaptation, is this deviation from the typical action packed spy-thriller. A Most Wanted Man is a slow burner. It requires patience, and an interest in geopolitics doesn’t hurt. But with that comes a more sophisticated type of storytelling, where complexity sits in place of linear plot lines, where moral questioning replaces the idea that good always triumphs, and where main characters live lives of desperation and paranoia, rather than possessing super human strength and foresight. A Most Wanted Man is as covert and impenetrable as the war on terrorism itself. The winners and losers are hard to define, and good and evil are a merely a matter of perspective.

- Bruno Mancini

Sunday, July 27, 2014

BOYHOOD: 12 YEARS LATER

We're all bracing ourselves for Boyhood around here. Everyone around the Bookshelf are huge fans of Linklater's classic 2005 remake of Bad News Bears, and we're sure Boyhood will be just as zany and heartfelt, even without Billy Bob Thornton.

Just kidding. About BNB, not about our anticipation for Richard Linklater's 12-years-in-the-making ode to childhood.

We're thrilled to announce that before the movie officially begins its first run on Friday August 15th, at 8:15pm, we're able to offer up a SNEAK PEAK on Thursday August 7th, at 7:30pm.

Everyone else seems super pumped for this landmark project as well. You can't throw a dart at the internet without hitting a rave review. So we'll throw one for you. Have a look at this New York Times Magazine piece, and take a scroll through twelve years of star Ellar Coltrane's portraits, taken by Matt Lankes.


Tuesday, July 15, 2014

PRIMER: DON GIOVANNI



Mozart wrote Don Giovanni for Prague in 1787. There had been a local tradition in that city of operas and ballets dealing with the subject of the legendary seducer. The text Mozart used was by Lorenzo da Ponte, in it he had one of the best opera libretti of its era. The other two late operas by Mozart to da Ponte’s texts were similarly excellent. These last three operas alone keep Mozart supreme in the opera world.

Seeing as these operas were produced for public showing, and were intended for the eventual discernment of the nobility and officialdom in power, it is astonishing how many vexing issues they raise about the social and cultural status quo of the times, and they could almost be seen as supporting a critique of the prevailing class structure. It is amazing that any objections were only sporadically mooted over Mozart's revolutionary or, at least, liberal tendencies.

All three of the da Ponte operas have, at their core, issues of master-servant relationships, and all three plots transpire in a world of unquestioned privilege for the noble class and the eventual abuses thus engendered.

Although Don Giovanni is almost by default labeled a 'dramma giocoso', and Mozart designated it an 'Opera buffa', its actual subject is, although Mozart refuses to take it seriously, the terminal case study of the career of a depraved psychopath who lets nothing get in the way of him and his pleasure. It is as if a serial killer like Paul Bernardo had the power and untouchability of a noble, and the constant help of a personal servant, and yet the whole discourse was set in a context of hi-jinx and comic obfuscation of the basic tragic denouement of a sinner going inexorably to his perdition in actual hellfire in the end.

Each subsequent scene of action compounds our outrage. We watch as the Don's conniving, evasive manipulations get him into ever more elaborate convulsions of intrigue and deception.

The whole action starts with a murder, the killing of the Commendatore as he attempts to protect his daughter from the Don's intrusion. This is almost thrown away, buried as it is by subsequent trivial events of attempted seduction, and mistaken identity, embarrassment and obfuscation.

By the way, all through this opera the Don never 'gets his rocks off,' and this side issue, only obliquely implied, has the Don become ever 'more horny,’ and reckless, as events transpire—since the opera seems to preserve a unity of time—following the action through one evening and night. It must have been difficult to address such a risqué subject at that time, but we become acutely aware of the immense, almost pathological, sex drive of someone who is constantly seducing and manipulating every available woman within reach. Brigid Brophy thought that the creation of Don Giovanni provided a sort of sexual catharsis for the seemingly frequently 'hard up' young Mozart.

One of the constant side themes of the opera is the mistreatment on several levels and ways by the Don of his servant Leporello. Since most of the events are cast in a sort of ironically jocund mood, we are only peripherally aware of the constant bullying that Leporello undergoes at the hands of his master. Even in the last scene of the banquet in the Don's palace where food seems to be everywhere, there is an issue over

Leporello being forced to serve the food while he must stay hungry. All the comic action of the opera has the nasty underside of showing how unfair and abusive every part of the servant's low status is.

There is special irony in the second act where Leporello disguised as the Don, is made to suffer a beating intended for his master, who always gets away unscathed and scot-free, before the redress of the horrific final denouement, with the trombones in baleful D minor, in which hell claims him.

Mozart had a thing about servitude. One of the most dramatic, and undoubtedly humiliating incidents in his life, was when he was thrown out of Prinz-Cardinal Colloredo's court for his lack of deference. They made the point of actually having the valet kick Mozart in the rear as he was physically thrown out the door. Yet Mozart had, by this point, experienced the deference of most of the crowned heads of Europe during his years of travel when he was shown off as a child virtuoso.

After this, Mozart was to remain freelance for the rest of his short career, and he never went 'into servitude' again. The distressing events we surmise but can scarcely make out from the available evidence at the end of his life: his financial trouble, possible gambling debts, exclusion from court, weakness, and terminal illness, should not have been possible if he had been able to put up with some sort of stable patronage. There were no social nets, no rights or protections in case one fell on hard times in that society at the end of the 17th Century, so one of the greatest geniuses of music got caught under the wheels of adverse events, and we do not even know where his body was buried amongst the paupers. Even the enormous success of Don Giovanni was not able to provide enough residual income to protect Mozart during that final obscure period of
his life.

Michael Doleschell keeps mostly to non-fiction, and is deeply devoted to music and culture and never tires of history, and is fascinated by science and the scientific method [as long as they are well explained]. He broadcasts a program of Classical Music for 3 hours every Saturday afternoon from noon till 3 on the U of G's Radio Station: CFRU.